Grade of Protection #3

By cliangNo Comments
The commodities (toys) are encapsulated in the vending machine (plastic containers). All containers share the same Point of Sales (PoS) device - the Octopus sensor. Upon successful payment, the outlet valve is released to pass out the selected item. You might wonder if these vending machines are securely protected as they are placed in open area and unattended. This is a typical scenario for cybersecurity practitioner in recommending business people the appropriate level of protection. There are CCTV in the arcade to record people accessing the vending machine. Physical brute force attack will be recorded. And for vending machine like this, physical is far more effective over cyber attack to collect the toys. Having recorded footage of physical attack won't be useful without the laws & regulations coming into place. The deterrent is that offender will be caught and prosecuted for criminal act. Last but not least, consider the total value of the commodities plus the equipment itself. If...
Read More

Policy #8

By cliangNo Comments
We face many "policies" (directives) everyday - whether in real world or in the cyber space. And we are told to comply with these policies for keeping ourselves safe or secure in both domains. Sometimes, don't blindly follow the policy because policy makers could make mistake: lack of field experience, don't understand the subject matter well, having implicit assumption causing incorrect interpretation or putting something that is even not practically achievable. As an user, you need to think, contribute or challenge policy makers. There isn't perfectness in this world. Things always need continuous improvement. Policy makers are expected Solicit opinions objectivelyListen feedbacksResolve ambiguityAddress incorrectness If they don't, they simply fail. ...
Read More

Enforcement

By cliangNo Comments
Enforcement Having policy as written document isn't enough. If there is violation, it must be enforced thru correctional approach. In real world, this is done by disciplinary action, imposing fine or even imprisonment depending on severity of violation. This will reinforce the attitude for policy compliance. An example is jumping the light detected by traffic camera. At best if there is no traffic accident, impose fine and deduct marks to remind this act will hurt other road users. At worst this misbehavior has triggered traffic accident, it might be resulted in criminal offence for imprisonment. In cyber world, the situation is similar. Stipulate the cybersecurity directive (policy) and indicate what is the protection objectiveEstablish policy exception processDefine the levels of correctional action per violation natureAnd most importantly, raise awareness to educate all levels why the policy must be complied for what purpose and consequence of violation ...
Read More

Assumption #3

By cliangNo Comments
DO NOT ACROOS - implicitly applied to vehicles only When we develop written directive, there might be chance that certain elements are assumed and be implicit. It is essential to engage stakeholders, listen to feedbacks and address opinions rather than dictate what should be done. If you do, you deem to be failed to develop a good policy. ...
Read More

Taxonomy #2

By cliangNo Comments
I have seen cybersecurity directive regarding applicability is to protect OT (Operational Technology) system so as to minimize cyber attacks to energy production. Renewable energy like solar panel or consumer grade wind turbine at household are producing energy with certain OT systems for control. Unfortunately, that organization also markets these equipment. Confusion arises if these OT systems should be under the same set of protection principles unless a precise specific taxonomy is specified in the directive. ...
Read More

Landscape

By cliangNo Comments
Some cybersecurity practitioners only drill down to the level of details of network diagram or even wiring diagram to identify adequacy of cyber protection. The system landscape or architecture is no doubt an element to look at but just part of it. The holistic approach shall look like these: What is the purpose of the systemHow is information used - control machine, information for decision making of critical operation or solely display as-isWhat is the consequence if compromisedWhat is the tolerable down timeWhat are options to bring up service within this unplanned down time windowHow to strike the balance for freezing the compromised system for digital forensic vs system recovery in meeting service pledge With these in mind, these diagrams are only useful to assess the attack path and the optimal countermeasures. And don't criticize insufficient information in the diagrams without setting a reference standard - this should be objective rather than subjective. ...
Read More

Taxonomy

By cliangNo Comments
In policy development, it is essential the coverage of the rule is sufficient and precise to avoid ambiguity. A living creature could be animals, birds, fishes, reptiles and human beings for full coverage. A targeted group might be stipulated as non-human living creatures, or even specific as reptiles when certain situations need more precision. Policy maker needs to understand clearly the scenario when formulating the directive just right in meeting practical implementation. ...
Read More

Blind Spot

By cliangNo Comments
Can the bird be detected? When designing controls, we must understand what to protect. There might be blind spot that the intended controls are ineffective or even void. For inherent design weakness, retrofit would be costly and sometimes not possible without rebuilt from scratch. As a good practice, a design review to assess the control effectiveness before build will avoid such pitfall. Either a peer review or engaging independent subject matter expert will help to spot weakness with fresh eyes. ...
Read More

Policy #7

By cliangNo Comments
The illustrated directive is unclear. Drone, also known as unmanned aerial vehicle, has different form factors. If the sign comes without the icon, then it's pretty clear. With the icon there, it becomes only this type of drone is not allowed. This happens exactly in typical policy statement for network connection where cybersecurity practitioners have implicit assumptions. The issue has been elaborated in earlier blog for network connection. In nutshell, the precise directive is to secure the network with the appropriate controls of layer 3 to layer 7 data flow. ...
Read More

Policy #6

By cliangNo Comments
What and when are allowed? Common pitfalls in writing policies (written directives) are: Embedded assumption by the author that is unknown to other readersFailed to provide clarityMost importantly, failed to listen feedback for adjustment We are hired to make professional judgment. We must not be fraid to challenge if the written directive is clear enough, not just because it has been approved by senior management. We also need to admit policy statement is never 100% perfect as the business environment is changing. An interesting example is the power energy sector. No doubt the power plant and grid are the Critical Infrastructure (CI) assets to secure from cyber-attack in order to maintain reliable supply to customers or comply with regulatory requirements. But we must not forget there are other sources like renewable energy that the "plant" is just a customer own installation outside the CI. How should the policy statement be precise enough to differentiate the cyber protection requirement will be a tough job....
Read More