Administrative Control

By cliangNo Comments
Certain cybersecurity practitioners insist to impose technical controls to secure the infrastructure/system. To some degrees yes, basic technical controls will prohibit human error or low skill attacks. Adding technical controls will never secure the infrastructure/system more. At some points, more controls will even degrade the security due to a number of issues: People will find ways to circumvent controls because affecting productivity (writing down complex password)New control might introduce new system weaknessExtra efforts are required to sustain the control effectiveness (upgrade, backup, other housekeeping tasks: patch, patch, patch ...) These are always the neglected elements. Sometimes, exercise administrative control will enforce discipline internally while externally relying laws & regulations. ...
Read More

Dual Standards

By cliangNo Comments
It is no harm to have dual standard to fit specific use case. As long as the directive is clearly stated, it is fine. For badly written policies, the policy requirements are subject to interpretation creating chaos. This happens especially due to incompetent cybersecurity practitioners. Therefore, the outcome of any security assessment should not just look at how the system is designed, built and operate. Validating the policy statement if it is up to industry best practice and practically achievable in commercial world are also equally important. ...
Read More

Competency

By cliangNo Comments
Incompetency to react with changing environment will lead to fatality Recently I gave a talk to a local university students about cyber survivability. At the end of the session, it's Q&A. One of the students asked "There are lots of challenges in the cyber space. Among them, what's the most serious challenges that you have met?". I told them people is the serious challenge. Decades ago, the human aspect is considered as the weakest link in cybersecurity. Over times, this remains. It's just a matter the focus has shifted. Now, general users are well aware of cyber deception in the cyber space like phishing and scam, be cautious of unknown requests and things too good to be true. Why is the human aspect still applied? It's about the cybersecurity practitioners. They are supposed the leader in cybersecurity of an organization. They are hired to provide professional judgment in enabling a secure business environment, steer in the right direction....
Read More

Seasonal Factor

By cliangNo Comments
There are network anomaly detection technologies to alert abnormal network traffic of potential cyberattack. The pre-requisite is let the technology learn the current network traffic pattern as baseline profile. Then anything outside this profile boundary will be treated as anomalies and triggers alert. It is a great technology - no signature or definition update for zero TCO maintenance. All are self-sustained. However, the key question is how long should the technology acquire the correct baseline profile? Some vendors claim just one or two weeks suffices. Really? Even with 80/20 rule, such short duration shall generate many false alerts that eventually affecting confidence. Realistically, duration in a year for setting up the baseline profile deems necessary to fully cover the normal traffic. After all, human perception especially senior management is important for successful deployment. A KPI dashboard shall provide visibility of the value of the technology. Last but not the least, network anomalies detection is just one layer of defense. We should strengthen...
Read More

Enforcement #4

By cliangNo Comments
A directive must come with sensible enforcement Cybersecurity policy establishment and cybersecurity policy enforcement are usually executed independently in an organization. Normally, policy authors are more knowledgeable to stipulate the rationale behind whether explicitly or implicitly why protection are required to secure the cyber space of the organization. Enforcement team simply follow the book to provide advisories or perform compliance check. The world is not perfect and situation will drive decision if it is a policy exception or the inadequacy of policy for revision. As cybersecurity practitioner, we must exercise our professional judgment to advise pragmatic approach in helping business for policy compliance rather than just a zero or one decision. After all, a "cyber court" in an organization is uncommon where the "cyber judge" will have the final ruling. Certain cybersecurity practitioners even have mal-practice to involve Senior Management for approval without taking up professional responsibility. Senior Management should be in the informed role rather than an approval role. ...
Read More

Opportunist

By cliangNo Comments
Dual signages on display - adopt the appropriate one in particular situation? Policy statement must be clearly defined and published. It must also be precise without ambiguity but subject to interpretation by different parties. If your cybersecurity policies are written unclear, a lot of unnecessary internal overheads of so-called policy exceptions or enforcement issues will be surfaced. Therefore, regular policy review and adjustment is indeed integrated into the policy requirement. And last but not least, don't be aggressive to write something that is not achievable in the specific business environment. ...
Read More

Spare Capacity

By cliangNo Comments
Roof needs to cater for extra loading due to different weather conditions Availability is one of the protection objectives in cybersecurity. When deploying new systems, the design must cater for spare capacity. Usage patterns need to be understood too as this will surge capacity demand instantaneously. Capacity refers to bandwidth, storage, processing speed. This must be estimated in the next 3-5 years with the projected growth rate plus the peak demand, setting threshold to trigger alert to resolve the capacity issue. It can be adding more storage, or archiving historical records offline, or deleting records per corporate retention policy. It is part of system management to maintain a healthy cyber environment to run business. Otherwise, business services will be interrupted. ...
Read More

Surrealism

By cliangNo Comments
It is easy to for artists to draw something or writers compose fictions beyond imagination. Such creation even stimulates innovation that when putting into practice disrupting the industry and our life. However when writing cybersecurity policies, the directives must be pragmatically achievable and effectively enforceable. After all, policies are the internal company rules for every level to comply with. If the rules cannot be achieved, nor enforced, these rules are just a document in the bookshelf. Follow what the industry or the peers do rather than inventing something high-sounding but cannot be landed on the ground. Non-compliance will be the outcome. ...
Read More

Purpose of control

By cliangNo Comments
When we deploy control, we always have to understand what we are trying to achieve. In the illustration, if the purpose is just to prevent accidential openning of the cabinet door hurting nearby pedestrian, then something fixes the door in position suffices. There is no need to apply a lock because it will involve key management. Without proper key management, accessing the cabinet inside will be affected. As such, don't impose unnecessary and excessive controls. It won't improve but complicate the use case. ...
Read More

Dead End

By cliangNo Comments
Can't turn left nor right and no pass thru ahead Good cybersecurity policies (management directives) should avoid incorrect interpretation nor perception. Further down the road, if policies is not precise generic nor precise specific for just-right coverage - many "policy exceptions" will be resulted. The most incorrect approach is to ask the senior management to approve such exception. The whole game should be the cybersecurity Subject Matter Expert (SME) assesses the area where policies cannot be complied with. The SME shall recommend pragmatic compensating controls and grant temporary approval while senior management is in the role of being informed. We, cybersecurity practitioners, must help senior management to understand cyber risks (mostly perception), how the risks could be exploited n own specific business environment. Like the recent Log4Shell zero-day vulnerability, understand what it is rather than blindly to push applying patches, assess the likelihood of exploitability and stand firm to explain why this is not severe if there are cyber threats intelligence...
Read More